Law Articles And Legal Issues

E-Discovery Emergence In Civil Litigation

The law, as a means of administering dispute resolution and criminal accountability, must be able to adapt to revolutions of industry or technology. We are currently in the beginning years of a technological revolution that will only grow and continue to change the way humans live their lives. Computer and internet use have changed the way that people and business think and act. In today?s judicial system, a case (either civil or criminal) is often decided by the evidence produced and discovered prior to trial. As computers have become the integral components of any successful business operation, the records on those computers have become more difficult to discover. Not only because of the difficulty of gaining access to an adversary?s computer records, but also because many seasoned attorneys do not even know what to look for when they do gain access. Adding to the confusion is a lack of guiding procedural and case law. New methods of discovery have hampered older, traditional attorneys who carry with them the knowledge and experience from the days of paper and pen. The old rules are obsolete, and in today?s world if you can not keep up with the technology and developments in the law then you will be left as ineffectual as the paper and pen you hold in your hand.

In response to the increased demands for structure in E-discovery, the ABA has proposed new Amendments to Civil Discovery Standards relating to the use of E-discovery. In part, these proposed amendments are aimed at providing guidance for evidence retention, destruction and production.

Electronic evidence presents many issues not previously experienced with more traditional forms of evidence. Certain forms of electronic evidence may be misleading and prejudicial to one party or the other, because one piece of evidence may only represent an initial draft of a document, containing information leading to the inference of liability. From a simple printout of electronic evidence, it can be extremely difficult to ascertain whether that evidence is the first or final draft, and whether that evidence has any impact on the dispute. In many ways electronic evidence provides for easier access because there is no need to search through cumbersome boxes of paper, but conducting the actual discovery process may exponentially increase the costs to both the producing and discovering parties. It takes substantial time to track down trails of information throughout a company?s network. From a plaintiff?s point of view, electronic evidence is difficult to destroy, as it takes an extremely complicated and sophisticated process to completely erase an electronic signature and metadata associated with the files. As demonstrated, electronic evidence may at times be more difficult to find, but conversely, it is also harder to destroy. This juxtaposition of qualities can make a process that appears more concise in theory, to actually become more cumbersome and costly when actually put into practice.

In response to these growing concerns, as part of its proposed amendments, the ABA has focused on E-discovery issues ranging from pre-trial conferences and electronically stored information to a party?s failure to comply with discovery or to cooperate. Unnerving to many plaintiff?s attorneys is proposed Amendment 37(f), which provides that:

"Unless a court order requiring preservation of electronically stored information is violated, the court may not impose sanctions under these rules on a party when such information is lost because of the routine operations of its electronic information system if the party took reasonable steps to preserve discoverable information."

This is perhaps the most troublesome (at least for plaintiff?s attorneys), because it effectively creates a safe-harbor for the destruction of electronic evidence. Sanctions would be barred when information is destroyed as a result of routine destruction practices. The rule mentions nothing about what a reasonable destruction practice is or whether a party must freeze those practices once it learns that there is a potential for litigation. Other important proposed amendments include:

Rule 33(d). Under the traditional Rule 33, a party responding to an interrogatory could produce business records as a substitute for explicitly responding to the interrogatory. Under Amended Rule 33(d), the responding party will be permitted to produce electronic dates and records when responding to interrogatories provided that the requesting party can easily identify and locate the sought after information.

Rule 34(b). The new proposed amendments do not require an attorney to choose a particular evidentiary format when responding to discovery requests, but its mere mention suggests a policy toward favoring electronic evidence. When a requested production format is not specified, the responding party should produce evidence in the manner in which that information is ordinarily maintained or, alternatively, in a form that is reasonably easy to access and use.

Rule 26(b)(5)(B). This amendment addresses the inadvertent production of privileged or protected information. This rule will allow a party who unintentionally discloses the privileged information to retrieve it from the accidental receiving party unless that party can prove that they have a right to that information.

Rule 45. This amendment to Rule 45 would essentially allow parties to subpoena electronically stored information pursuant to any of the other adopted amendments contained in the Rules.

These are not the only proposed changes, but this brief summary of the proposed amendments is a good demonstration of the increasing preference for electronic discovery. The legal world is changing and those attorneys who are unable to keep up with the changes will be left in the dust. This move by the ABA should serve as a sign to those attorneys frightened by technology and advancements in the law. Electronic discovery is here to stay, unlike those who refuse to welcome the changes to the judicial discovery process.

This article was written by Nicholas Deleault, a Franklin Pierce Law Student. Nicholas writes select legal articles for the Law Firm of http://www.goldsteinandclegglaw.com/blog, a http://www.goldsteinandclegglaw.com

Other Article Sites

findabook.com  moneycd.info  a-mortgage.info   about-lemon-laws.info  aboutstudentloans.info
all-about-publishing.info  auctions-articles.info  bestcollege-university.com  bestispconnection.com
biblefolder.com  blogger-website.com  books-used.info  brokers-guide.info  buywindows.info  cable-dsl.info
career-miner.com  carpel-tunnel.info  cashinaflash.info  cashloanreviews.info  casinobell.com  chat-house.info
clearmycredit.info  collegeloantips.info  crones.info  depression-articles.info   dirnic.net  dishguides.info
divers-below.com  expodog.info   financewizz.com  fire-insurance.info  getgood.info  handleit.net   it-idea.info
health-supplies.info  hosting-right.com  insidealert.com  insurance-facts.info  jobs-employment.info
justgood.info  lookgold.net   lowcost-travel.info  money-source.info  myhostzone.info  numisblog.com
peoplesearchfinder.info  pr-articles.info  realeas.com   refinancing-guides.info  spyware-remove.info
telelot.info  the-law.info   toppaid.info  travel-deals.info  travelcorrect.com  wedding-guide-site.com
your-blog.info  your-credit.info

Other Law Sites
Search The Internet For Other Law Sites

Law Books
Search For Law Books At FindaBook.com

Lemon Law Attorney, Dana Lynn Tarquini, Featured at Lemon Law Administrators Conference
Ms. Tarquini, one of the country's most prominent lemon law attorneys, participated in panel discussion at the 10th anniversary lemon law administrators conference in Atlantic City.

Legal Services of Labor Law Attorneys
Labor law attorneys deal with a broad range of labor issues mainly related to how employers treat employees, former employees and applicants for employment. This includes all the areas of the employer-employee relationship, negotiations, and the collective bargaining agreement.

Pending Federal Law Threatens All Copyright Owners says the Hodgson Law Group
The Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 (S. 2913) "Orphan Works Act of 2008" (H.R. 5889) allows anyone to use a copyrighted work without first obtaining permission. The user can later claim that a diligent search was conducted but the owner could not be found in any later action for infringement. This new legislation will apply to all copyright owners whether or not the work was previously registered with the Copyright Office. The legislation threatens the rights of artists, photographers, composers, film makers, publishers, and visual artists says the Hodgson Law Group. The Copyright Office not only endorses this legislation, but also advocates further changes that go beyond the proposed statute in reducing copyright protection. T...

New Legal Guide to Divorce by Family Law Expert
A brand new legal guide to divorce, "Divorce and Separation Today", has been newly published by DragonCub. Far more useful than the average divorce guide, it delves into how the divorce courts operate as well as providing practical and sensible advice on emotional and other sensitive areas. It is an essential guide for anyone considering or going through divorce.

Kirsten Branigan Joins McDonald Law Group, LLC Adding Depth in Employment Law
Kirsten Branigan and Nancy McDonald join forces with a shared passion--advocating for advancement of women in the practice of law.

Tax Attorney Roni Deutch Analyzes Proposed Tax Laws in New Featured Blog
After nearly seven months of blogging, tax attorney Roni Deutch has posted a new featured blog analyzing the causes and possible outcomes of a new proposal that is being backed by the Internal Revenue Service. The proposal is part of President Bush's 2008 budget, and attempts to lower the gap in what taxpayers pay and what they should pay in taxes, by requiring many Internet companies to collect personal data from their users.

Houston Bankruptcy and Family Law Practice Announces Affiliation with Houston Civil Litigation, Business Law and Immigration Law Firm
Houston bankruptcy attorney Michael Busby of Busby & Associates joins forces with Carlos Peniche & Michael Rojas of Peniche and Rojas to offer Texans comprehensive legal services - from divorce, personal injury and civil litigation to contract disputes, employment law and immigration services.

Central Florida Family Law Lawyers Appel & Gaines Offers Creative and Collaborative Divorce Solutions
The lawyers at Appel & Gaines, LLP experience first hand their client's struggles with the emotionally challenging, destructive and costly process of divorce in Florida. Therefore, their attorneys frequently suggest to clients that they initiate a "collaborative" approach to resolving their family law issues.

Monroe, N.C. Family Law Attorneys Merge Practices to Form Stepp Lehnhardt Law Group
Donna Stepp and Dana Lehnhardt combine local practices and operations, creating 4-attorney general practice law firm with emphasis on family law

Elizabeth A. Kreitzer, Certified Family Law Specialist, Joins Klinedinst Family Law Group
The California-based law firm of Klinedinst PC has added Elizabeth A. Kreitzer, Certified Family Law Specialist, to its expanding Family Law practice group. Ms. Kreitzer's addition, combined with the strength of the firm's existing litigation teams, will help ensure that every client receives sophisticated, professional and compassionate representation, Ms. Kreitzer is the recipient of the Michael C. Shea Chair in 2005, and adds a wealth of family law knowledge to the department. She is experienced in working with sophisticated clients handle complex family law issues, including divorce, paternity and custody disputes, prenuptial agreements, adoption proceedings, and other family law matters.

Divorce Lawyer Says Families Do Not Belong In The Court Of Law
Fresno divorce attorney Erin Rhames-Childs says that the court of law is no place to divorce. The courts are overworked and understaffed - leading to poor legal decisions that are not in the best interests of those involved. Collaborative divorce is a way for couples to divorce while maintaining their dignity, making decisions that truly are in the best interests of their children and preserving their finances. Collaborative divorce is quicker, cheaper, and better for maintaining functional relationships for after the divorce is over.

Los Angeles Divorce Attorneys, The Family Law Company, Opens a New Office in Beverly Hills
Los Angeles family law attorney and founder of The Family Law Company Pamela Wright opens a new office in Beverly Hills. The Family Law Company offers high-quality legal services at affordable rates for divorce, paternity, child custody and child support actions because justice doesn't have to cost a fortune.

CalBizCentral Announces Booklets to Help Businesses Navigate State, Federal Employment Laws, Reduce Legal Risk
CalChamber's CalBizCentral 'What Every Manager Needs to Know About' series provides training managers need to comply with confusing laws.

Fresno Family Law Attorney Says Collaborative Law Can Provide Smoother and More Affordable Divorce
Fresno family law attorney Erin Rhames-Childs says collaborative law can help people can reduce the conflict and cost of divorce litigation.